Tag: Certified cyber security consultant in Australia

HomeArchives

Why Remote OEM Maintenance Access Is an OT Governance Blind Spot

When an original equipment manufacturer, or OEM, remotely connects to a factory environment, it may diagnose equipment or configure a programmable logic controller. This connection creates a temporary pathway through the organisation’s security boundary. This access may be necessary to...

Continue Reading  

The Fog of War: How Active Cyber Investigations Test Boardroom Governance and Technical Defences

When a cyber incident strikes, technical containment is only one part of the response. In that situation, boards and executives must make regulatory, legal and communication decisions before the technical investigation is complete. The governance challenge is to act quickly...

Continue Reading  

Governing Autonomous AI Agents: Closing the Executive Identity Risk Gap

Autonomous AI agents are moving beyond content generation into operational decision-making. They query customer databases, update records, interact with cloud infrastructure, call business APIs, and communicate with employees or third parties. This changes the enterprise risk model. Cyber risk is...

Continue Reading  

The Hidden Attack Surface: Governing Legacy Client Data in Insurance Brokerages

Insurance brokerages retain sensitive information such as policy schedules, claims histories, identity records, financial disclosures and correspondence. When historical data sits in forgotten servers, backup platforms, inherited systems or former branch environments, it creates a hidden attack surface. The key...

Continue Reading  

Why Network Infrastructure Requires Continuous Technical Validation

Risk committees often assume routers and firewalls are secure once deployed, patched, and logged in the risk register. But network devices are control points, not static assets, they drift from approved baselines through firmware age, legacy services, exposed management interfaces,...

Continue Reading  

Third-Party Access in Aviation: Who Owns the Risk?

Temporary vendor access becomes a governance risk when no one remains accountable for its continued use. Aviation organisations depend on maintenance providers, ground-handling companies, software suppliers and specialist engineers to support complex operational environments. These relationships require external access to...

Continue Reading  

The Price of Assumption: Why Testing Cyber Controls Costs Less Than a Lockout

Treating corporate defence as a discretionary cyber security expense rather than a core operational baseline creates an unacceptable structural liability for industrial supply chains. When corporate boards rely on unverified assumptions regarding their defensive capabilities, they expose their entire production...

Continue Reading  

Privacy Commissioner Warns RentTech Platforms on Personal Data Overreach

Digital platforms now shape many parts of daily life, including the rental housing market. Prospective tenants often rely on online applications to secure a property. These systems promise convenience and efficiency. However, they also collect large amounts of personal information....

Continue Reading  

Why “Baseline Security” Is No Longer Enough in 2026

Ten years ago, most organisations relied on basic cyber controls. A firewall, antivirus, and routine patches were seen as good enough. This approach matched the threats of the time. In 2026, the threat landscape looks very different. Attackers use automation,...

Continue Reading  

Zero Trust & Identity-First Security Models

Zero Trust is a security approach based on one simple rule: never trust, always verify. Instead of assuming that “inside the network” is safe, every access request is treated as potentially risky. This mindset matters in IoT/OT because networks are...

Continue Reading